OBJECTIVE: To determine body image disturbance and relationship satisfaction between obese and non-obese ple consisted of 100 participants. Data was collected through purposive sampling technique from different gyms and nutrient-clinics of Johar Town, Faisal Town and Model Town of Lahore city. Educated females having minimum education level of intermediate belonging to upper and middle-class families were recruited. The shortened form of Body Shape Questionnaire and Relationship Assessment Scale were administered, in addition to collecting demographic information through a semi structure performa. Independent sample t-test and Pearson’s Product-Moment Correlation was used in the analysis of the data, using SPSS v.21.RESULTS: Most of obese and non-obese married women (n=) were in the age range of 25-35 years and 30-40 years respectively with mean age of 34 years for obese and 33 years for non-obese married women. Husband’s mean age for obese and non-obese was 39 years and 38 years respectively. Almost all the non-obese (n=) while most of the obese (n=) married women were having education level of 16 or more while almost all the non-obese (n=) were working women and most (n=) of the obese were house wives. Thirty-two () non-obese were having 2-6 years while (n=) obese married women were having 7-9 years of marriage duration. A significant relationship was shown at the level of body image disturbance (p<0.000) and marital satisfaction (p<0.000) between obese and non-obese married women.CONCLUSION: Obesity has significant impact on body image and relationship satisfaction in married women.
Blog post Info
Authors are permitted and you will motivated to article what they do on the web (age.grams., for the institutional repositories or on their website) in advance of and you can within the distribution procedure, as you possibly can result in effective exchanges, and additionally earlier and you will higher violation out-of had written performs.
Industry Health Business. Obesity and you may heavy 2016. Federal Institute off All forms of diabetes and you can Digestion and you may Renal Problems. Heavy and you may being obese statistics [Internet] 2012. Burkhauser Rv, Cawley J. Past Bmi: the worth of significantly more appropriate procedures from fatness and being obese inside the societal technology search. J Health Econ 2008;27(2):519-29. DOI: /j. Crowther Nj, Norris SA. The modern waist width slash area used in the analysis out-of metabolic disorder inside sub-Saharan African girls is not suitable. PLoS One to 2012;7(11):e48883. DOI: /diary. Goswami S, Sachdeva S, Sachdeva Roentgen. Human anatomy photo fulfillment certainly one of girls college students. Ind Psychiatry J 2012;21(2):168-72. DOI: -53. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson Yards, Thomson B, Graetz Letter, Margono C, mais aussi al. Globally, local, and you may federal frequency off over weight and you may carrying excess fat in kids and you will adults through the 1980-2013: a medical research toward Worldwide Load away from Problem Analysis 2013.
New Lancet 2014 May 30;384(9945):766-81. DOI: /S0140-6736(14)60460-8. Jernigan Am, Tergas AI, Silk AJ, Fader A keen. Being obese management when you look at the gynecologic cancers survivors: supplier practices and you may thinking. Am J Obstet Gynecol 20. Sallis JF, Owen N, Fische EB. Ecological different types of fitness decisions. When you look at the Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, writers. Wellness Conclusion and you may Wellness Studies: Concept, Research, and practice. JOSSEY-Trout, a wiley imprint. John Wiley & Sons, San francisco, Us. Bandura An effective. A personal cognitive concept regarding identification. During the Pervin L, John O, publishers. Guide off personality. Guilford Courses, Nyc, United states of america. Sarwer DB, Lavery Yards, Spitzer JC. A glance at the brand new relationships between significant carrying excess fat, quality of life, and you will intimate setting. Obes Surg 2012 Annual percentage rate;22(4):668-76. DOI: /sstep one1695-012-0588-1. Paeratakul S, White MA, Williamson Da, Ryan DH, Bray GA.
Gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic updates, and you can Bmi about self?impact of heavy. Obes Res 20. McNulty JK, Neff Los angeles, Karney BR. Past initially destination: physical appeal in newlywed Feb;22(1):135-43. DOI: -. Arcelus J, Yates An excellent, Whiteley R. Intimate relationship, health-related and sub-systematic dinner issues: A review of the fresh new literary works. Intercourse Family Ther 20. Stokes R. Frederick-Recascino C. Ladies identified system photo relationships with individual delight. J People Ageing 2003;15(1):17-31. DOI:/J074v15n01_03. Zawawi JA. Dating between Bmi, Muscles Image Dissatisfaction and Psychological Stress among Fitness center Ladies Users from inside the Zarqa-Jordan. Int J Hum Soc Sci 2014;4(1):11-20. Evans C, Dolan B. Shape questionnaire: Derivation regarding shortened “option models”. Int J Eat Disord 1993;13(3):315-21. DOI: -108X(199304)13:step three step three. CO;2-step three. Tactics Good, Fidanza F, Karvonen MJ, Kimura Letter, Taylor HL.
Indicator off relative weight and being obese. Int J Epidemiol 2014;43(3):655-65. DOI: /ije/dyu058. Hendrick SS. A simple measure of matchmaking pleasure. J 1988;50(1):93-8. DOI:29. AL-Otaibi HH, Naseef SL, Raouf TA. Muscles picture disappointment, pounds condition and exercise among a sample off university students inside Saudi Arabia. Food Nutr Sci 2013;4(6):616-25. DOI:/fns. Seligman MEP. Positive fitness. Appl Psychol 2008;57(1):3-18. DOI: /j. Yamamiya Y, Cash TF, Melnyk SE, Posavac, Hd, Posavac SS. Women’s connection with narrow-and-beautiful media photo: Muscles picture results of media-ideal internalization and feeling-cures interventions. System Visualize 2004;2(1):74-80. DOI:/j. Lovell GP, Gordon JA, Mueller MB, Mulgrew K, Sharman R. Pleasure from Basic Psychological Requires, Self-Calculated Take action Desire, and you may Psychological Really-Staying in Parents Exercising in group-Founded In the place of Private-Dependent Contexts. Medical care People Int 2016;37(5):568-82. DOI:333. O’Brien KS, Latner JD, Ebneter D, Hunter JA.
Being obese discrimination: the fresh character out of physical appearance, personal ideology, and you can anti-weight prejudice. Int J Obes (Lond) 20. Give PG, Boersma H. And make sense of being pounds: A good hermeneutic study from adults’ reasons having being obese. Couns Psychother Res 2005;5(3):212-20. DOI: 1690500310429. Choo J, Jeon S, Lee J. Sex differences in wellness-related quality of life of this abdominal being obese when you look at the a Korean society. BMJ Discover 20-003954. Bolton MA, Lobben I, Strict TA. Brand new impact out of body picture for the diligent proper care. Prim Care Lover J Clin Psychiatry 2010;12(2):722-34. DOI: /PCC. Meltzer AL, McNulty JK. Human anatomy picture and you will marital satisfaction: facts on the mediating part off sexual volume and sexual satisfaction. J Fam Psychol 2011 April 1;24(2):156-64. DOI: /a001906. Pujols Y, Secure BN, Meston CM. The fresh new association anywhere between sexual satisfaction and the body picture in females.
J Intercourse Med 2010;7(2 Pt dos):905-16. DOI:/j. Ludwig J, Sanbonmatsu L, Gennetian L https://datingranking.net/pl/established-men-recenzja/, Adam E, Duncan GJ, Katz LF, ainsi que al. Communities, obesity, and you will diabetes–a great randomized societal try out. N Eng J Med 2011 October 20;365(16):1509-19. DOI: /NEJMsa1103216. Williams K. Has the way forward for ination out of intercourse, relationships, and you may mental well-getting. J Fitness Soc Behav 2014 Can get a dozen;44(4):470-87.